Optimizing and Assessing Robustness of Vehicle Restraint Systems with LS-DYNA, LS-OPT, and DEP MeshWorks
12th European LS-DYNA Conference 2019, Koblenz, Germany - C. Goubel, T. Maillot, V. Lapoujade, M. Seulin, N. Van Dorsselaer (Dynas+ Engineering Products), J.Y. Gouiffes (ROUSSEAU Equipements)

Abstract
Road safety structures, such as barriers, must comply with rigorous crash testing standards like the EN1317 norm. However, the wide variability in vehicle designs and testing conditions creates significant challenges for engineers to ensure performance reliability.
This paper introduces a cutting-edge approach utilizing DEP MeshWorks’ advanced morphing capabilities, coupled with LS-OPT and LS-DYNA, to address these challenges. By efficiently managing complex constraints and enabling sensitivity studies, this methodology optimizes barrier design, improves robustness, and enhances the accuracy of numerical simulations.
The study provides valuable insights into designing safer, more reliable road safety structures that meet stringent regulatory requirements while addressing the variability in crash test conditions.
Key Insights from the Study
- Objective: To improve the reliability and robustness of vehicle restraint systems through advanced simulation and optimization techniques.
- Challenges Identified:
- Variability in vehicle designs used for crash testing.
- Discrepancies between numerical simulations and experimental results.
- Proposed Solution:
- Use of a unified impactor model across Europe to standardize crash tests, enhancing reliability and accuracy.
- Results:
- Improved barrier performance robustness.
- Enhanced numerical simulation reliability through better vehicle modeling.



Methodology Overview

- Software Used:
- DEP MeshWorks: Morphing and parameterization for design exploration.
- LS-OPT: Sensitivity studies and optimization for robust design.
- LS-DYNA: Numerical crash analysis and simulation.
- Steps in the Process:
- Morphing and parameterization of barriers for initial design optimization.
- Sensitivity studies to evaluate performance variability due to vehicle design differences.
- Proposal of a unified impactor model for consistent testing across Europe.

Conclusion
